LESSON 7 OF 8 · LAUNCH
Running a no-commitment CTV pilot against your current setup
QUICK ANSWER
A CTV pilot should answer one question with one test, on terms you can walk away from. Run it next to your current channels or current CTV provider and compare on the same metric.
By The Tuning Desk · CTV Ad Finder · Published 2026-10-10 · Updated 2026-10-10 · 3 min read
What should a pilot prove?
One thing. Pick the decision the pilot informs, such as whether to add streaming TV to the plan, or whether to move budget from your current CTV provider, and the metric that decides it. A pilot that tries to prove reach, brand lift and sales at once rarely proves any of them.
Why avoid long commitments in a pilot?
A pilot is a test of fit. If the platform cannot show results on your metric, you want to stop without paying for months you will not use. Several platforms state no-commitment or no-minimum terms on their pages; others publish a minimum per campaign or only for managed service. Read the exact terms and get them confirmed in writing.
- Amazon DSP (now part of Amazon Ads Agent) Stated
"DVA+ uses cost per mille (CPM) billing with no minimum spend."
- MNTN Stated
"No upfront commitments. No minimums."
Source: MNTN homepage
- Vibe (vibe.co) Stated
The pricing page says "No Commitment"; the MCP page says "no annual contract".
Source: Vibe pricing page
- Disney Campaign Manager (formerly Hulu Ad Manager) Partly
No subscription, setup or installation fees, with a minimum spend of $500 per campaign.
- Roku Ads Manager Partly
No upfront payment: "Pay as your campaign delivers". The $500 figure is guidance, not a stated minimum.
Source: Roku Ads: how much does it cost to advertise on Roku
- Tatari Partly
"Tatari supports flexible minimums"; no dollar figure.
How do you run a pilot against your current provider?
- Keep the same goal, metric and attribution window for both.
- Split by region or by audience so the two do not reach the same households.
- Run a holdout or geo test inside the new platform so you can read lift, not only attributed results.
- Use a third-party partner both platforms can report into, if you have one.
- Agree the test length in advance and compare only at the end.
Running the pilot next to your current setup is fairer than running it alone. Seasonality, promotions and news affect every channel at once; a side-by-side design keeps those effects equal for both, so the difference you see is more likely to come from the platform. If you have no current CTV provider, compare against a holdout and against the cost per result of your existing performance channels.
What do you need ready before launch?
Tracking that works, creative in the right specs, a written list of the named services you will run on, the fee structure, and the test design. The launch checklist on this site lists 20 steps in order.
What should you agree with the platform in writing?
Before launch, write down the budget, the start and end dates, the minimum or commitment if any, every fee on top of media, the named services the ads will run on, the test design and how results will be reported. Add who on each side owns the test and how changes are approved. It takes an hour and prevents most of the disputes that end pilots badly, such as a holdout that was quietly reduced, a fee that appeared on the first invoice, or inventory that did not match the plan. A platform that is confident in its results will usually agree to these terms readily.
How do you decide after the pilot?
Compare the lift and cost per incremental result with your other channels, not only the platform's attributed ROAS. If the result is clear, scale in steps and keep a holdout running. If it is unclear, change one thing, such as the audience or the creative, and test again rather than abandoning the channel on one read.
Key terms
AttributionAttribution windowCTV (connected TV)Geo testLiftManaged serviceROAS (return on ad spend)Streaming TV